Project
Roadmap
See the planned direction for browser testing, mobile testing, reports, visual automation, and Studio.
Documentation goal: this page is written as practical product documentation, with enough context to help a real QA engineer decide how to use the feature in a maintainable test suite.
Browser testing direction
The browser runner roadmap focuses on clearer diagnostics, stronger locator explanations, better parallel scheduling, and richer report filtering.
Mobile direction
Mobile work focuses on Studio workflow polish, stronger Android evidence capture, better device state handling, and smoother Companion setup.
Longer-term ideas
Future areas include API testing, richer visual assertions, additional dashboard views, and more integrations for CI artifacts and team reporting.
Reference table
| Area | Planned work |
| Shell | Clearer terminal output and report opening |
| Core | More natural waits and errors |
| Mission Control | Filtering and scheduling improvements |
| Surface | Better ambiguity diagnostics |
| Studio | Device workflow and evidence polish |
Practical checklist
- Keep the workflow readable enough that a QA engineer, developer, or product teammate can understand the intent without opening application source code.
- Prefer user-visible names, stable configuration, and clear evidence over hidden assumptions or brittle implementation details.
- Run the smallest useful check locally before adding it to CI, then verify that failures produce screenshots, logs, traces, or reports that explain what happened.
- Review this part of the suite regularly so outdated examples, stale setup, and obsolete workarounds do not reduce trust in the automation.
Common mistakes to avoid
- Do not add automation only to increase test count. Each page and test should protect a clear user journey, release risk, or debugging need.
- Do not hide important behavior inside helpers so deeply that the test no longer explains what the user is doing.
- Do not rely on fixed sleeps when the application can expose a meaningful ready state such as visible text, URL change, element availability, or completed evidence capture.
- Do not ignore failing artifacts. A report, screenshot, trace, or log entry should feed back into better product code, better waits, or clearer test data setup.
Was this page useful?
Your response is saved in this browser and helps shape the docs experience.